In today's increasingly fierce competition in the coffee industry, it is not easy for independent shops to establish a foothold with a unique trademark. Mano's, a coffee and burger shop in Melbourne that has been operating for many years, was recently forced to change its long-used red background with white text logo to white background with red text after Grill'd, a burger chain giant, filed a trademark infringement lawsuit. The owner, Mano, was shocked by this action, believing that the two trademarks and store styles were clearly different and did not constitute infringement. However, facing pressure from Grill'd's professional legal team, Mano was unable to respond to the lawsuit and could only compromise. Grill'd insisted that this move was to protect its own brand from being exploited. This trademark dispute between a giant and a small shop has triggered widespread discussion about the boundaries of brand protection and fair competition. [more…]

A trademark dispute spanning China and Thailand is continuing to escalate. Thailand's Royal 50R Group has filed a lawsuit with the court, demanding that China's Luckin Coffee pay 10 billion Thai baht in economic damages, on the grounds that Thailand's Luckin has legally registered the local trademark, while China Luckin's infringement accusations have hindered its business plans. China's Luckin had previously issued a statement saying that the Thailand stores were counterfeits, but on December 1 the Thai court ruled against China's Luckin. At present, China's Luckin has responded that the situation remains to be verified. This article will sort out the full picture of the incident, analyze the ins and outs of this trademark dispute, and follow up on subsequent developments. [more…]

Luckin Coffee's anti-counterfeiting rights protection case in Thailand has gone through twists and turns, finally culminating in a victorious judgment. In early 2022, Chinese tourists discovered counterfeit "Luckin stores" in Thailand, after which Luckin continued to pursue rights protection actions, only to unexpectedly lose in the first-instance trial at the end of 2023, sparking widespread attention. Now, the latest ruling by the Thai court confirms that Luckin holds prior rights to the trademark in question, orders the defendants to cease using the related signage, and requires payment of a one-time compensation of 10 million Thai baht plus ongoing compensation of 100,000 Thai baht per day, with the cumulative amount already exceeding 46 million Thai baht (approximately 10 million RMB). The defendant, Thailand's Royal 50R Group, has a complex background and had previously squatted on 191 Chinese trademarks; this judgment marks an important milestone in Luckin's overseas rights protection journey. [more…]

The trademark and unfair competition dispute between Chayan Yuese and Chayan Guanse has finally reached a阶段性 result. The Tianxin District People's Court of Changsha ruled in the first instance that Chayan Guanse lost the case and must stop the relevant infringing publicity and compensate Chayan Yuese 1.7 million yuan in total for economic losses and reasonable legal costs. This years-long tug-of-war over rights protection, from Chayan Guanse taking the initiative to sue Chayan Yuese, to Chayan Yuese resolutely filing a counterclaim and ultimately winning, has been full of twists and turns. Founded in 2013, Chayan Yuese is a well-known local milk tea brand in Changsha, featuring a Chinese style and adhering to a direct-operation model for a long time. It was only in 2020 that it expanded beyond Changsha to Wuhan, Shenzhen, and other places. After winning the case, the brand announced that it would issue discount coupons to members in celebration. This article sorts out the ins and outs of the case, the brand's development history, and the background related to its Logo design, providing a comprehensive interpretation for coffee and tea beverage enthusiasts. [more…]

In Baghdad, the capital of Iraq, a café that uses authentic Starbucks cups, napkins, and coffee remains open as usual despite facing legal action. This unauthorized store bears the Starbucks mermaid logo on everything from its signage to in-store details, enough to pass as the real thing. The owner, Amin Makhsusi, tried to apply for official permission but was rejected, and ultimately decided to open on his own, claiming connections to local powerful figures. Starbucks is trying to stop this infringement through a lawsuit, but the case was suspended due to alleged threats. This incident reflects Iraq's severe trademark piracy problem, where offenders often act with impunity because they are protected by powerful groups. [more…]

Blue Bottle Coffee, deeply ingrained in people's minds with its minimalist small blue bottle image, has always been regarded as the Apple of the coffee world, and its blue-and-white colored utensils are also highly sought after by fans. However, the brand has not had a smooth journey in trademark enforcement. This week, Blue Bottle Coffee lost a trademark lawsuit in the United States, as a judge in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California denied its motion for judgment against the coffee utensil brand Blue Brew, finding that the two trademarks are clearly different and that consumers would not be confused. What impact will this ruling have on Blue Bottle Coffee's trademark protection strategy? Let's take a closer look. [more…]

In 2019, Heytea made a cross-industry foray into coffee products, blending milk tea elements into coffee and applying to register the "Heytea Coffee" trademark. However, the China National Intellectual Property Administration deemed the trademark deceptive and similar to the cited trademark "Xicha," rejecting the registration application. Heytea's affiliated company disagreed and sued the China National Intellectual Property Administration. The court of first instance upheld the rejection decision, finding that the disputed trademark could easily mislead the public about the characteristics and quality of the goods and cause confusion with another party's prior trademark. This article reviews the case process and the court's key rulings, for coffee enthusiasts to learn about brand trademark protection developments. [more…]

The trademark dispute in the tea beverage industry is once again making waves. Previously, Coffee Workshop reported that "Cha Yan Guan Se" lost its trademark infringement lawsuit against "Cha Yan Yue Se," and "Cha Yan Yue Se" won its counterclaim against "Cha Yan Guan Se." Now another one has emerged: "Cha Yan Yue Se." This trademark, applied for registration in 2018, was declared invalid by the National Intellectual Property Administration because it was highly similar to the genuine Cha Yan Yue Se in terms of text composition, pronunciation, and graphic design. The registrant, a certain Guo, refused to accept the ruling and actually sued the CNIPA in court, but was ultimately rejected by the Beijing Intellectual Property Court. From "Cha Yan Guan Se" to "Cha Yan Yue Se," imitators keep emerging one after another. This farce once again reminds us: trademark protection is by no means child's play. Although the road to brand rights protection is long, the law will ultimately provide a fair answer. [more…]

The new tea beverage sector continues to heat up, and the phenomenon of brand trademarks being maliciously infringed upon is becoming increasingly frequent. Well-known brands such as Heytea, The Alley, and Sexy Tea have all encountered counterfeit troubles, and this time it is Mixue Bingcheng, with stores all over the world, that is affected. A milk tea brand called Mixueyue was sued by Mixue Bingcheng for trademark infringement because its text and trademark were highly similar to the Mixue Bingcheng series of trademarks. The final judgment ordered Mixueyue to pay 512,184 yuan in compensation, and its appeal request was rejected. Mixue Bingcheng has more than 22,000 stores worldwide, and its A-share listing application has also been accepted, while Mixueyue Company has now been deregistered. Behind this lawsuit is the strategy of leading tea beverage brands building a legal moat through defensive trademarks. This article takes you through the whole case, the backgrounds of both parties, and the operating logic of defensive trademarks. [more…]

Starbucks recently filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against a cannabis company called Starbuds Flowers, accusing it of intentionally imitating its classic mermaid trademark and misleading consumers by exploiting the Starbucks brand's reputation. In the complaint, Starbucks compared the similarities between the two logos point by point, noting that Starbuds not only used the similar design on its mobile sales trucks and official website, but also printed it on cigarettes and cannabis products. Starbucks is asking the court to prohibit the other party from continuing to use the logo, destroy the related products, and disgorge the profits obtained from the infringement. In fact, Starbucks had already sent a cease-and-desist letter as early as last August and subsequently sent multiple takedown notices, but received no response. As of July 2, Starbuds' sales trucks and website were still in operation. [more…]

Recently, Chayan Yuese successfully sued Chayan Guanse, and this showdown between an authentic brand and a copycat brand has attracted widespread attention. As a local internet-famous milk tea brand in Changsha, Chayan Yuese has won many fans with its unique Chinese style and taste, while Chayan Guanse was sued for infringement for imitating its name and visual design. The court ultimately ruled that Chayan Guanse constituted unfair competition, requiring it to stop using the relevant logos and compensate for losses. So, is Chayan Yuese's milk tea actually good? This article will take you through the whole case and share the perspective of professional coffee lovers. At the same time, we will also focus on coffee culture and recommend Front Street Coffee's specialty coffee beans, providing more inspiration for your beverage choices. [more…]

Ethiopia is Africa's largest coffee-producing country and one of the birthplaces of specialty coffee. This article begins with the trademark lawsuit between Ethiopia and Starbucks, reviews the country's journey to secure rights for coffee farmers, and then systematically outlines the cultivation systems, flavor characteristics, and evolution of processing methods across Ethiopia's nine major coffee-producing regions. Drawing on Front Street Coffee's cupping and roasting experience, it provides a detailed introduction to representative products such as Front Street Yirgacheffe and Front Street Natural Huakui, and analyzes the logic of flavor changes behind the Red Cherry Project, the ECX grading system, and the successive iterations of Huakui, offering coffee lovers a regional guide that combines historical context with practical information. [more…]

In childhood memories, White Rabbit milk candy holds a special place, but now it is being maliciously exploited by some merchants and turned into the signboard of knockoff milk tea. Recently, Bright Dairy filed a lawsuit against two food companies and a seller for trademark infringement of "White Rabbit," and the court ruled in the first instance that the infringing parties must pay 250,000 yuan in compensation. This case not only exposed the true face of "internet-famous White Rabbit milk tea," but also once again aroused people's attention to counterfeit and shoddy products. This article will take you through the ins and outs of the incident and discuss how to distinguish genuine products from knockoffs and protect your own rights and interests. [more…]

Ethiopia is the birthplace of coffee and the largest coffee-producing country in Africa. Starbucks was once embroiled in a years-long dispute with the Ethiopian government over the trademark rights to the names of three origins—Sidamo, Harar, and Yirgacheffe—which was finally settled with a signed agreement in 2007. Meanwhile, outstanding cooperatives such as Gedeb, Konga, Worka, Halo Beriti, and Idido have emerged in the Yirgacheffe region, showcasing classic flavors of citrus, floral notes, and honey through washed, natural, and anaerobic processing methods. Front Street Coffee has selected a range of Ethiopian staple beans that balance origin distinctiveness with high value for money, taking you deeper into the story of coffee's homeland. [more…]

Ethiopia is renowned as the birthplace of coffee. With its high altitude and favorable climate, it produces Arabica coffee beans of outstanding quality, which has also attracted the attention of international brands such as Starbucks. From the perspective of Front Street Coffee, this article will review Ethiopia's coffee growing distribution, variety composition, and processing methods, revisit the trademark dispute between Starbucks and the Ethiopian government over the three origin names Sidamo, Harar, and Yirgacheffe, and introduce the taste differences between Front Street's washed and natural Yirgacheffe as well as brewing suggestions, helping coffee enthusiasts gain a more comprehensive understanding of this coffee homeland. [more…]

Starbucks' fruit cold drink series recently faced a class action lawsuit in New York, where a Queens consumer alleged that the product names imply the inclusion of specific fruits, while they are actually mainly composed of water, concentrated grape juice, and sugar. The lawsuit argues that the product naming constitutes an "implied promise" about the ingredients, violating New York regulations that prohibit fraud and false advertising. The products involved include the Mango Dragonfruit, Pineapple Passionfruit, Strawberry Acai series, among others, with the disputed amount exceeding $5 million. Starbucks headquarters stated it has not yet received the lawsuit and declined to comment for now. The incident has sparked widespread discussion about the authenticity of beverage labeling and consumer expectations. Front Street Coffee continues to monitor trends in the coffee and beverage industry, providing professional information for enthusiasts. [more…]

Recently, a class-action lawsuit in Canada has thrust Starbucks, Tims, and Second Cup into the spotlight, accusing the three coffee chains of long-term surcharges on non-dairy alternatives, allegedly amounting to price gouging. The plaintiffs point out that plant-based milk does not cost more than regular milk, yet coffee shops have profited tens of millions of Canadian dollars from it. Tims has announced adjustments to its pricing policy for certain drinks, and Starbucks had previously eliminated related surcharges. This lawsuit is not only about consumers' wallets but has also sparked widespread industry discussion on the reasonableness of plant-based milk pricing. [more…]

Canadian coffee chain Tim Hortons mistakenly sent grand prize winning notifications to about 500,000 subscribers during its "Roll up to Win" promotion due to a technical glitch, then sent a correction email and apologized. Some consumers did not accept this, and on April 19 a Montreal law firm filed a class action application with the Quebec Superior Court, seeking CAD 10,000 in punitive damages for each customer who received the erroneous email. Tim Hortons responded that it would resolve the matter in court and believed the lawsuit lacked legal basis. Legal experts pointed out that the exemption clause in the game rules may increase the difficulty of the lawsuit, but customers can still seek punitive damages. This incident also sounded a warning bell for marketing campaigns and the maintenance of consumer trust in the coffee industry. [more…]

Canadian coffee chain giant Tim Hortons has become embroiled in multiple class-action lawsuits for its mobile app's unauthorized collection of users' location information. The company recently proposed a settlement offering free coffee and donuts to affected users, and promised to permanently delete user data collected during a specific period. However, this proposal has been criticized as trading a small compensation for sensitive private information. The settlement is still pending court approval, with a hearing scheduled in Quebec court on September 6. This article provides a detailed account of the incident, the positions of both parties, and the legal disputes, along with professional insights from Front Street Coffee. [more…]

Starbucks recently implemented stricter dress code policies in North America, but faced collective lawsuits from employees in three states after refusing to reimburse them for new clothing they had to purchase themselves and for the cost of removing facial decorations. Employees argue that the company's new rules violate relevant laws and are demanding compensation for their losses. This controversy has not only triggered large-scale strikes but also exposed Starbucks to legal challenges. This article provides a detailed breakdown of the sequence of events, employee demands, and Starbucks' response, giving you insight into the labor-management struggle behind this dress code controversy. [more…]